Treatability step 4 of 4
Pilot Testing for Electrochemical Oxidation Systems
Stage-gate methodology
Bench, continuous pilot, and full scale have different jobs
Start with a written design basis
Define the decisions the pilot must support
Required definition: Typical, low-load, high-load, startup, cleaning carryover, seasonal temperature, conductivity, chloride/bromide, hardness, solids, oil, metals, and pH cases.
Why it matters: Prevents a design that works only on an average composite.
Required definition: Named pollutant limit, COD/TOC endpoint, toxicity or biodegradability target, residual oxidant limit, and downstream process requirement.
Why it matters: Defines when additional charge stops creating project value.
Required definition: Required flow, turndown, hours per day, production schedule, equalization, redundancy, allowable downtime, and utility limits.
Why it matters: Links laboratory performance to plant availability and module count.
Required definition: Byproducts, electrode-metal release, gas hazards, electrical classification, cleaning residuals, permit constraints, and operator exposure.
Why it matters: Places safety and compliance in the test scope rather than after equipment selection.
Required definition: Electricity tariff and demand charges, electrode replacement basis, labor, cleaning chemicals, cooling, ventilation, pretreatment, residual disposal, and analytical cost.
Why it matters: Supports a life-cycle decision instead of a reactor-only energy comparison.
Bench protocol
Minimum bench test matrix
- Use representative typical and worst-reasonable feed cases from the characterization program; retain untreated, time-zero, and process blanks.
- Identify each anode by coating, substrate, active area, coating thickness or loading where available, manufacturer, lot, and prior service history—not only as “BDD,” “MMO,” or “PbO₂.”
- Compare shortlisted anodes at equal geometric current density and equal charge dose. Record electrode gap, wetted area, current, cell voltage, temperature, mixing or flow condition, polarity, and gas behavior.
- Run a current-density sweep that includes a kinetic region, the transition toward mass-transfer limitation, and an overdriven condition. Repeat the sweep at low and high target concentration.
- Collect time-series samples for the named target, COD, TOC, pH, conductivity, chloride/bromide, residual oxidant, biodegradability or toxicity endpoint, and matrix-specific transformation products.
- Use replicates, analytical duplicates, blanks, matrix spikes, and calibration checks sufficient to separate treatment response from wastewater and laboratory variability.
- Test pretreatment and cleaning options early when suspended solids, oil, hardness, silica, metals, polymers, or surfactants can block electrode surfaces or channels.
- Report two energy boundaries: electrochemical reactor power and total skid power including pumps, cooling, controls, ventilation, pretreatment, and residual handling.
Continuous pilot campaign
Run the pilot in controlled phases
Feed condition: Clean water or approved surrogate
Work scope: Verify flow meters, pressure transmitters, RTD method, leak tightness, interlocks, data historian, current distribution, and heat removal.
Gate to proceed: Approved checkout; baseline pressure drop and resistance.
Feed condition: Representative wastewater at conservative load
Work scope: Confirm safe startup, quench, sampling, gas handling, stable current control, and material compatibility.
Gate to proceed: Stable operation with no unresolved safety or data-quality issue.
Feed condition: Typical and boundary feeds
Work scope: Factor current density, net and recirculation flow, charge dose or residence time, pH, conductivity, and pretreatment.
Gate to proceed: Response surfaces for removal, ICE, SEC, byproducts, voltage, and pressure drop.
Feed condition: Actual production sequence
Work scope: Operate through multiple production cycles and enough fouling/cleaning events to establish drift, recovery, labor, and residual generation.
Gate to proceed: Validated cleaning interval, availability basis, and electrode-condition trend.
Feed condition: Low load, peak load, minimum flow, maximum temperature, and utility disturbance cases
Work scope: Prove controls and identify failure limits without exceeding the approved hazard envelope.
Gate to proceed: Operating alarms, trip points, recovery procedure, and design margins.
Feed condition: Selected configuration and setpoints
Work scope: Repeat the proposed full-scale operating window with independent analytical verification.
Gate to proceed: Dataset suitable for design review and commercial acceptance criteria.
Pilot skid design
Move from a mixed beaker to controlled continuous hydraulics
Pilot requirement: Known working volume, representative mixing, high/low level protection, feed and effluent composite sampling, and a defined mass-balance boundary.
Scale-up reason: Separates reactor performance from influent variability.
Pilot requirement: Full-scale-relevant electrode gap, plate orientation, spacers, seals, channel depth, active area, electrical contacts, and materials of construction.
Scale-up reason: Voltage, current distribution, gas release, pressure drop, and short-circuit risk depend on geometry.
Pilot requirement: Measured single-pass flow, recirculation flow, channel velocity, hydraulic diameter, pressure drop, and flow distribution by channel or module.
Scale-up reason: Nominal skid flow does not establish anode mass transfer.
Pilot requirement: Tracer test or equivalent method at each relevant flow configuration; document dead volume, bypassing, and dispersion.
Scale-up reason: Calculated tank volume divided by flow can overstate effective contact time.
Pilot requirement: Galvanostatic and voltage-limit capability, ripple documentation, logged current/voltage/power, ramp control, polarity capability only where approved, protection, and interlocks.
Scale-up reason: Defines current distribution, heat load, electrical sizing, and cleaning options.
Pilot requirement: Continuous temperature logging, heat exchanger or cooling provision, minimum-flow case, and high-ambient case.
Scale-up reason: Conductivity, kinetics, gas evolution, seals, coatings, and worker exposure can change with temperature.
Pilot requirement: Hydrogen and oxygen/chlorine assessment, gas-liquid separation, vent routing, detection where required, and verified no-gas-pocket geometry.
Scale-up reason: Gas generation scales with current and can reduce effective area or create hazardous atmospheres.
Pilot requirement: Isolation, drain, rinse, chemical clean, deposit sampling, plate inspection, safe lifting, and controlled collection of cleaning residuals.
Scale-up reason: Maintenance interval, labor, residual disposal, and coating damage are major OPEX and availability inputs.
Pilot requirement: Safe diversion, secondary containment, overflow route, emergency stop, spill response, and controlled quench where needed.
Scale-up reason: A pilot is an operating chemical and electrical system, not a laboratory accessory.
Critical operating parameter
Optimize current density against mass transfer, voltage, and side reactions
Increasing geometric current density can raise oxidant generation and apparent removal rate only while oxidizable material reaches the anode fast enough and the desired pathway retains a useful share of the current. As the target concentration falls or the boundary layer thickens, oxygen evolution, chlorine chemistry, heat, and other parasitic reactions take a larger fraction of the power. Treatment can become faster while kWh per kilogram removed and byproduct control become worse.
For each feed case, plot target removal rate, COD or TOC removal, ICE, reactor SEC, total-skid SEC, cell voltage, temperature, residual oxidant, and specified byproducts against both current density and charge dose. Select an operating band that remains stable across the influent envelope. Test current turndown or a staged current profile when high current is useful at the inlet but inefficient near the endpoint.
Hydraulics and mass transfer
Specify verified mass transfer—not turbulence by name alone
- Turbulent or otherwise high-shear, well-distributed flow is usually needed to reduce boundary-layer resistance and limit deposits. The design target is measured mass transfer and distribution, not a Reynolds-number label.
- Measure net flow, recirculation flow, channel velocity, hydraulic diameter, pressure drop, flow split, and residence-time distribution. Nominal skid flow does not prove uniform electrode exposure.
- Confirm gas-bubble release and gas holdup. Bubble coverage can reduce effective area, alter pressure drop, and create uneven current distribution.
- Test the lowest expected pollutant concentration, where mass-transfer limitation and current-efficiency loss are often most severe.
- Include recirculation pumping and cooling in total-skid SEC; optimize hydraulic energy jointly with electrochemical energy.
- Inspect inlet/outlet manifolds and individual plates for uneven deposits, coating wear, temperature hot spots, vibration, erosion, and gas locking.
- Use Re = ρuDₕ/μ only as a hydraulic descriptor. Confirm the effective residence time with a tracer or equivalent test rather than relying only on V/Q.
- For a defined electroactive species, jlim ≈ nFkₘC can guide interpretation. Do not apply a single electron number to bulk COD without documenting the assumptions.
Anode material selection
Compare BDD, MMO/DSA, and PbO₂ as exact constructions
BDD: Diamond coating, substrate, dopant or resistivity information where available, thickness/loading, active area, edge sealing, and electrical contact design.
MMO / DSA: Exact oxide formulation and loading, titanium grade, interlayer, active area, coating process, and supplier life basis.
PbO₂: PbO₂ phase/composition, substrate and interlayer, coating thickness, adhesion method, edge sealing, active area, and supplier restrictions.
BDD: Direct and non-active anodic oxidation, hydroxyl-radical chemistry, and mediated oxidants present in the actual matrix.
MMO / DSA: Direct oxidation plus matrix-dependent mediated chemistry; chlorine evolution can dominate in chloride-bearing water depending on coating formulation.
PbO₂: High oxidation potential may be useful for some targets; performance and selectivity depend strongly on coating and wastewater composition.
BDD: Chlorate/perchlorate in chloride, bromate in bromide, AOX or halogenated products as applicable, target intermediates, and substrate/coating indicators.
MMO / DSA: Free/total chlorine, chlorate, AOX and chlorinated products, coating metals, and target intermediates.
PbO₂: Dissolved and particulate lead, other coating metals, oxyhalides, target intermediates, cleaning residuals, and worker/residual exposure.
BDD: Voltage and efficiency trend, coating/substrate inspection, pinhole or delamination evidence, thermal/mechanical cycling, contact resistance, and supplier construction record.
MMO / DSA: Voltage, passivation, coating-metal release, coating loss, contact resistance, and tolerance of the intended cleaning method.
PbO₂: Lead mass balance, adhesion, substrate exposure, coating loss, voltage drift, cleaning compatibility, residual classification, and jurisdictional acceptability.
BDD: Installed area cost, demonstrated service life, replacement downtime, repairability, byproduct controls, and power at the selected endpoint.
MMO / DSA: Recoating/replacement interval, formulation-specific performance, energy, cleaning tolerance, and required byproduct treatment.
PbO₂: Any purchase-price advantage must be evaluated against lead monitoring, exposure control, residual disposal, permit risk, and liability.
Fouling and maintenance
Prove the cleaning interval on real wastewater
At constant current, normalized cell voltage is the primary online indicator of rising resistance. Interpret it with conductivity and temperature correction, pressure drop, flow distribution, visual inspection, deposit mass, and deposit chemistry. Carbonate, metal hydroxide, silica, polymer, oil, and mixed deposits respond to different cleaning methods.
Establish a no-reversal baseline before testing cleaning. Polarity reversal may reduce cathodic scale only where both electrode constructions and the power supply are approved for reversal. Compare candidate intervals against the control and log ramp, current-off time, voltage recovery, solids release, byproducts, and coating-metal release. Chemical cleaning must be selected from deposit analysis and assessed for coating compatibility, worker safety, neutralization, rinse volume, and waste disposal.
Define the maintenance trigger from normalized voltage, pressure drop, flow imbalance, temperature, or treatment drift. After every event, quantify voltage and pressure-drop recovery, treatment recovery, labor, chemicals, downtime, residual volume, and electrode condition.
Data collection
Specific Energy Consumption (SEC), current efficiency, and anode condition
Equation: SECV = U × I × t / Vtreated
Engineering use: With U in volts, I in amperes, t in hours, and volume in litres, the result is Wh/L, numerically equal to kWh/m³. Report average and conservative fouled voltage.
Equation: SECV = U × I / Q
Engineering use: Use time-aligned voltage, current, and net flow. Report total-skid SEC separately with pumps, cooling, controls, ventilation, pretreatment, and residual handling.
Equation: SECm = electrical energy / mass removed
Engineering use: State the basis: kg COD, kg TOC, or kg named pollutant removed. State how non-detects and censored data were treated.
Equation: q = I × t / V
Engineering use: Report Ah/L or kAh/m³ with the active liquid volume and sampling time.
Equation: q = I / Q
Engineering use: With I in A and Q in L/h, q is Ah/L. Pair charge dose with current density, hydraulic regime, and influent concentration.
Equation: ICE (%) = F × V × ΔCOD × 100 / (8 × I × Δt)
Engineering use: For a batch interval: COD in g O₂/L, V in L, I in A, and Δt in seconds. For continuous flow, replace V/Δt with Q in L/s. State the calculation convention and analytical uncertainty.
Equation: rA = Q × (Cin − Cout) / A
Engineering use: Mass removed per active anode area and time at verified steady state. Use time-matched samples and uncertainty.
Equation: w = Δm / (A × t) and/or released coating mass / charge
Engineering use: Report mass per area-time and mass per Ah where measurable. For coated electrodes, combine gravimetry with deposit correction, voltage, inspection, contact resistance, and dissolved/particulate coating-metal balance.
Analytical monitoring plan
Measure treatment, byproducts, and process health together
Minimum data: Current, voltage, calculated power, net and recirculation flow, pressure, temperature, pH, conductivity, tank level, ventilation or gas alarms where applicable.
Purpose: Detect fouling, flow loss, overheating, current limitation, utility disturbance, and unsafe conditions.
Minimum data: COD, TOC, named target, residual oxidant, chloride/bromide, alkalinity, hardness, TSS, oil, key metals, and production-state identifier as relevant.
Purpose: Link performance and fouling to the real influent envelope.
Minimum data: Target and intermediates, COD/TOC, biodegradability or toxicity, AOX/halogenated products, chlorate, perchlorate, bromate, coating metals, and application-specific mass-balance parameters.
Purpose: Locate the treatment endpoint, byproduct peak, and residual toxicity.
Minimum data: Normalized voltage recovery, pressure-drop recovery, deposit mass/composition, cleaning chemical use, rinse volume, downtime, coating condition, and cleaning-waste analysis.
Purpose: Establish maintenance labor, residual handling, and performance recovery.
Minimum data: Standardized photographs, dimensions/weight where meaningful, contact resistance, coating/substrate condition, and dissolved/particulate coating metals.
Purpose: Detect localized failure before average performance changes.
Minimum data: Field duplicate, method blank, equipment blank where applicable, matrix spike/matrix-spike duplicate, laboratory control sample, continuing calibration verification, preservation and hold-time record.
Purpose: Demonstrate that changes are treatment effects rather than sampling or analytical artifacts.
Safety and byproducts
Electrical, gas, chemical, and residual risks belong in the pilot scope
- Complete a site-specific process hazard review before operation. Define energized-part guarding, isolation, lockout/tagout, grounding, ground-fault protection, emergency stop, low-flow/dry-run trips, voltage limit, overtemperature protection, and restart logic.
- Assess cathodic hydrogen and anodic oxygen, chlorine, or other gases. Provide gas-liquid separation, compatible vent materials, ignition control, monitoring, and safe discharge according to the site hazard assessment and applicable code.
- Use Faraday-law gas estimates only as a starting point: H₂ ≈ Iη/(2F), O₂ ≈ Iη/(4F), and Cl₂ ≈ Iη/(2F). Measure or conservatively bound current efficiency and convert at actual temperature and pressure.
- Define residual oxidant quenching and verify that the quench does not bias target, COD, toxicity, or byproduct analyses.
- Monitor chlorate, perchlorate, bromate, AOX or other halogenated products, coating metals, target intermediates, and matrix-specific transformation products. Parent-compound disappearance alone is not proof of safe treatment.
- Characterize scale, filters, spent cleaning solution, quench residuals, and retired electrodes before disposal, treatment, or recycling.
- Do not assume a pilot permit exemption. Confirm discharge, air, hazardous-material, electrical, waste, and site-approval requirements with the responsible authority.
- Final ventilation, detection, electrical classification, materials, alarms, and emergency response require qualified review for the actual enclosure, chemistry, jurisdiction, and operating current.
Scale-up worksheet
Convert the selected pilot operating point into equipment size
Equation: I = q × Q
Engineering use: For continuous operation, use a consistent unit set. Example: q in kAh/m³ and Q in m³/h gives current in kA.
Equation: A = I / j
Engineering use: Use the selected geometric current density and include module turndown, current-distribution margin, and unavailable area.
Equation: PDC = Udesign × Idesign
Engineering use: Use conservative voltage at minimum conductivity, maximum approved gap, fouled condition, and design temperature. Add rectifier losses and auxiliary loads separately.
Equation: Vreactor = Q × τ
Engineering use: Use the pilot-verified effective residence time and reactor model. Correct for gas holdup, dead volume, bypassing, and required liquid inventory.
Equation: Ppump = ΔP × Q / ηpump
Engineering use: Include recirculation flow and the fouled pressure-drop condition. Optimize pump energy jointly with electrochemical SEC.
Equation: Qinstalled ≥ Qrequired / availability
Engineering use: Build availability from cleaning duration, inspection, electrode replacement, planned maintenance, and credible module outages.
Scale-up methodology
Carry electrochemical, hydraulic, and reliability behavior—not treatment time
Keep or verify: Comparable local current, busbar/contact resistance, plate spacing, edge effects, rectifier control, and current mapping where practicable.
Failure if ignored: Hot spots, uneven coating wear, unexpected voltage, gas generation, and byproducts.
Keep or verify: Comparable Ah per treated volume or pollutant mass across typical and boundary feeds.
Failure if ignored: Undersized residence time or excessive energy.
Keep or verify: Comparable channel velocity/shear, flow distribution, gas release, surface condition, and effective active area.
Failure if ignored: Bench kinetics fail in a poorly distributed full-scale module.
Keep or verify: Comparable reactor model, bypassing, dead volume, dispersion, and recirculation ratio.
Failure if ignored: Nominal volume meets the calculation while real short-circuiting misses the endpoint.
Keep or verify: Conductivity range, temperature, gap, contacts, cable and bus losses, and fouled condition.
Failure if ignored: Rectifier undersizing, overheating, and higher OPEX.
Keep or verify: Measured heat generation/removal at maximum current, minimum flow, highest ambient, and fouled resistance.
Failure if ignored: Temperature drift, material damage, gas release, and control instability.
Keep or verify: Same pretreatment, deposit chemistry, surface velocity, reversal or cleaning method, trigger, downtime, and waste route.
Failure if ignored: Availability, labor, and electrode replacement cost are understated.
Keep or verify: Design percentiles, equalization, feed-forward or feedback variables, turndown, bypass, and module staging.
Failure if ignored: The system meets average conditions but fails during production peaks or low-load inefficiency.
Keep or verify: Construction-specific evidence, voltage/contact trend, coating-metal release, cleaning exposure, inspection, and stated extrapolation uncertainty.
Failure if ignored: Replacement budget and warranty are based on unsupported life claims.
Commercial engineering view
Build OPEX from measured operating events
Pilot-derived input: Reactor kWh/m³, total-skid kWh/m³, kWh/kg removed, peak kW, demand-charge basis, rectifier efficiency, pump and cooling load.
Pilot-derived input: Installed active area, exact construction, demonstrated condition trend, replacement/recoat interval basis, spare strategy, labor, access, and disposal or recycling.
Pilot-derived input: Trigger, frequency, downtime, labor hours, chemical concentration and volume, rinse water, neutralization, residual volume, solids capture, and coating compatibility.
Pilot-derived input: Filtration, oil removal, softening, pH/conductivity adjustment, residual oxidant quench, biological polishing, adsorption, or residual handling required by the selected endpoint.
Pilot-derived input: Operating hours, cleaning outage, inspection, planned maintenance, credible module failure, restart time, redundancy, and bypass/storage requirement.
Pilot-derived input: Routine process monitoring, byproduct panel, coating-metal monitoring, gas detection calibration, permit sampling, record retention, and independent performance testing.
Pilot-derived input: Low conductivity, high chloride/bromide, peak load, low target concentration, high electricity price, short electrode life, frequent cleaning, and reduced availability.
Business-case rule: State the energy boundary, influent envelope, endpoint, availability, electrode-life evidence, residual route, and exclusions. Do not present a single electricity value as total operating cost or extrapolate a short clean-electrode run across the asset life.
Acceptance criteria
Define pass, conditional pass, and fail before startup
Acceptance criterion structure: Named target, COD/TOC, toxicity or biodegradability endpoint achieved for every representative feed case at the stated sampling frequency and confidence.
Acceptance criterion structure: Reactor and total-skid SEC remain below the project limit at the selected endpoint, including conservative voltage, fouling, and hydraulic conditions.
Acceptance criterion structure: Specified byproducts and coating metals remain below project limits or are controlled by a defined downstream step; no unexplained toxicity increase or unmanaged residual.
Acceptance criterion structure: Stable flow distribution, pressure drop, RTD, gas disengagement, minimum-flow operation, and module staging across the design range.
Acceptance criterion structure: Cleaning trigger, interval, recovery, labor, residual volume, and downtime support the required plant availability.
Acceptance criterion structure: No unacceptable coating failure, substrate exposure, contact degradation, metal release, or voltage deterioration; life extrapolation and uncertainty documented.
Acceptance criterion structure: Interlocks, ventilation, quench, isolation, sampling, cleaning, emergency response, and restart procedure are demonstrated and accepted by site stakeholders.
Acceptance criterion structure: Life-cycle cost remains viable under agreed sensitivity cases for energy tariff, influent peak, electrode life, cleaning frequency, residual handling, and availability.
Pilot deliverables
The package required for a full-scale design
- Issued pilot basis of design, process description, PFD/P&ID, electrical one-line basis, controls narrative, cause-and-effect matrix, sampling plan, data-quality plan, and hazard review.
- Raw and quality-checked time-series dataset linked to feed chemistry, sample IDs, production conditions, alarms, cleaning events, and calculation version.
- Selected anode construction and operating window covering current density, charge dose, net and recirculation flow, RTD, voltage, temperature, pH/conductivity limits, gas handling, and cleaning strategy.
- Treatment, byproduct, toxicity or biodegradability, energy, hydraulic, thermal, gas, maintenance, and electrode-condition results with uncertainty and deviations.
- Full-scale mass, charge, energy, heat, gas, and hydraulic balances; electrode area, reactor volume, rectifier, pump, cooling, ventilation, equalization, and residual-handling sizing basis.
- CAPEX basis, OPEX model, availability model, sensitivity analysis, spares and replacement plan, commissioning consumables, and stated exclusions.
- Commissioning performance-test procedure with influent envelope, sampling method, calculation rules, acceptance period, non-conformance handling, and remedy framework.
- Open-risk register identifying unresolved chemistry, scale-up, supply-chain, coating-life, compliance, and operability issues with assigned design controls.
For project teams evaluating an EO pilot
Information required to prepare a defensible pilot scope
Information to provide: Average, peak, minimum, batch size, operating hours, production cycles, equalization volume, storage or bypass limits.
Information to provide: Recent raw data and sampling dates for target compounds, COD, TOC, pH, conductivity, chloride, bromide, alkalinity, hardness, TSS, oil, silica, metals, temperature, and known cleaning chemicals.
Information to provide: Discharge, reuse, biological pretreatment, toxicity, biodegradability, color/odor, residual oxidant, or named-contaminant objective with applicable limit.
Information to provide: Available power, voltage, hazardous-area classification, ventilation, water, drain, cooling, footprint, lifting/access, chemical restrictions, and operator coverage.
Information to provide: Process flow diagram, pretreatment, downstream treatment, upset history, current chemical use, sludge/residual route, and permit conditions.
Information to provide: Target startup date, pilot location, desired test duration, data ownership, witness testing, acceptance criteria, and required estimate class.
Information to provide: Project owner, technical contact, EHS contact, sampling laboratory, regulator or authority interface, and required review/approval steps.
Trust and technical review
Document the author, evidence, limits, and review status
Publication and technical governance: Publish with a named author, relevant qualifications and project experience, a named technical reviewer, review date, revision history, and applicable jurisdiction. Distinguish general engineering guidance from site-specific test results. Do not claim a guaranteed removal rate, electrode life, operating cost, safety outcome, or permit result without documented project evidence. Final equipment selection, electrical classification, ventilation, chemical handling, residual disposal, and discharge compliance require qualified review and authority approval.
“Direct and Mediated Anodic Oxidation of Organic Pollutants.” Chemical Reviews 2009. DOI: 10.1021/cr9001319.
“Pilot Scale Performance of the Electro-Oxidation of Landfill Leachate at Boron-Doped Diamond Anodes.” Environmental Science & Technology 2009. DOI: 10.1021/es802748c.
“Combination of electro-oxidation and biological processes for lindane landfill leachate treatment.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135765.
“Formation of Chlorination Byproducts and Their Emission Pathways in Chlorine-Mediated Electro-Oxidation.” Environmental Science & Technology 2015. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01675.
for the exact shortlisted anode construction in real wastewater, including long-duration voltage, byproduct, coating-release, cleaning, and inspection data.
and applicable local occupational exposure, ventilation, electrical, hazardous-material, lockout/tagout, and process-safety requirements.
accredited laboratory scope, jurisdiction-approved wastewater methods, permit conditions, and commissioning performance-test procedure.
Use note: confirm the current edition, jurisdiction, method applicability, and laboratory accreditation before applying any reference to a project.
Common questions
EO pilot testing FAQ
Start with a scoped request, not a blind quote
Request a Treatability Assessment
Tell us where your stream sits against the characterization, classification, and applicability steps, pilot testing for electrochemical oxidation wastewater treatment technologies and systems covered on this site, and we’ll come back with a scoped testing plan rather than a generic proposal. If you haven’t run any of those steps yet, that’s fine — note what you do know and we’ll help fill the gaps. If you already have a lab report or water analysis on hand, attaching it in step two saves a round trip.
Disclaimer: No obligation, and no lab work gets scheduled until you confirm scope. Typical response time is one business day. Uploaded files are used only to scope your assessment.